Stay Informed

Optional Member Code
 

House debates “unfunded mandate” - Education News

House debates “unfunded mandate”

Education News Colorado

Allowing high school students to take college classes before graduation usually is a feel-good issue that attracts wide legislative support. A 2009 upgrade of what’s call concurrent enrollment passed both houses unanimously.

But House Bill 12-1043, which would create opportunities for students who are ahead of schedule in their high school studies, has had heavy going in the House, primarily because of fears about what it would cost school districts.

The bill would apply to high school students who start their senior years needing less than a full year’s worth of classes to graduate. Such students could choose to take college classes, and districts would be responsible for paying college tuition up to $3,176 a year. Districts would continue to count such students as enrolled and receive per pupil funding, which averages about $6,500 a year statewide.

A key issue is student choice; existing concurrent enrollment programs require district approval for students enrolling in college classes.

Rep. Kathleen Conti, R-Littleton and sole sponsor of the bill for now, had the bill amended in the House Education Committee to meet some district concerns.

But that apparently wasn’t enough for some House Democrats, who criticized the bill during floor debate.

“Here we are about to pass another unfunded mandate,” said Rep. Andy Kerr, D-Lakewood. “The intent of the bill is good … the problem is the bill doesn’t come with any additional funding,” added Rep. Millie Hamner, D-Summit County.

A Hamner amendment to make the program optional for districts was defeated, but the House did give voice approval to a Kerr amendment that says school districts wouldn’t have to implement the program until per-pupil funding returns to levels of 2008-09, the last year before school budget cuts began.

Conti returned to the microphone to defend the bill, saying, “There has been a lot of confusion on this issue.”

Then, Rep. Amy Stephens, R-Monument, stepped to the podium and exercised the majority leader’s prerogative, laying the bill over until Tuesday.

Read more

Defeat of RTA bill leaves many questions - Denver Business Journal

Defeat of RTA bill leaves many questions

Denver Business Journal

By killing a bill meant to clarify the Regional Tourism Act (RTA) on Friday, a Colorado House committee has reopened debate over the purpose of a program granting tax breaks to visitor-generating projects — and has misinterpreted the purpose of the 3-year-old RTA, according to a legislator whose bill created the program.

The House Appropriations Committee killed House Bill 1056, sponsored by Rep. Andy Kerr,D-Lakewood, on a 7-6 vote, with all seven Republicans opposed and all six Democrats in favor.

The bill attempted to specify that projects receiving tax-increment financing were those that would attract out-of-state tourists and increase the state’s sales-tax break. Six projects, including a proposed Gaylord Entertainment Co. hotel/conference center in Aurora, have applied for the first round of RTA funding, and the Colorado Economic Development Commission (EDC) at its April meeting may choose two to get tax breaks.

But several Republicans on the committee said the state has interpreted wrongly the 2009 bill that established the RTA and that the EDC, which is a part of the Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade (OEDIT), should give equal consideration to projects that draw tourists from Colorado.

Rep. Cheri Gerou, R-Evergreen, said the Office of State Planning and Budgeting (OSPB) and OEDIT are “working outside legislative control” after analysts hired by OSPB delivered reports to OEDIT stating that the six current applicants shouldn’t get tax-increment financing for visitors attracted from within the state.

“What this bill would do is undervalue the driver of local and regional tourism as an economic impact,” said Rep. Bob Gardner, R-Colorado Springs, before the committee killed HB 1056.

Read more

House panel signs off on bill to clarify Colorado tourism tax-break program - Denver Business Journa

House panel signs off on bill to clarify Colorado tourism tax-break program

The chaotic Regional Tourism Act (RTA) application process took a step toward receiving some clarity Wednesday when a Colorado House committee approved a bill specifying that projects receiving tax breaks under RTA should be those that attract out-of-state visitors.

House Bill 1056, sponsored by state Rep. Andy Kerr, D-Lakewood, now moves onto the House Appropriations Committee, where it could still face Republican opposition. But it passed a major hurdle Wednesday when the House Local Government Committee approved the measure by a 9-2 vote, including the backing of three of the five GOP members on the committee.

Former Gov. Bill Ritter created the RTA in 2009 when he signed a bill allowing the state to designate two tourism projects that could keep most or all of the state sales tax coming into their designated area and put it toward infrastructure and project construction.

Kerr and Rep. Keith Swerdfeger, R-Pueblo West, sponsored a successful bill in 2011 that expanded the number of potential funding recipients to six over the next three years, and six projects have applied to become the first two designated RTA projects ­— a decision that the Colorado Economic Development Commission is expected to make in April.

But the process was thrown into turmoil recently when a third-party analyst hired by the state determined that the tax-increment financing sought by each of the six applicants was inflated because it included money generated by in-state as well of out-of-state visitors.

Although the bill setting up the RTA mentions the need to generate out-of-state visitors in three separate areas, there is one reference in the legislation to needing to generate revenue only from outside the designated regional tourism zone.

Kerr told committee members that he needed to change that language to reflect the out-of-state revenues because he did not intend for state-subsidized projects to “encourage cannibalization from one zone to another within the state.

Ken Lund, executive director of the Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade, said he listened to the testimony from the hearings on both bills and determined that RTA proponents had clearly meant to subsidize projects that bring revenue to the state.

But several RTA applicants who are more geared at drawing in-state visitors or keeping Coloradans from traveling to other states for vacations and sports tournaments said that Kerr’s proposed changes under-value the dollars from “staycations” in this state.

Terrence Quinn, director of planning services for Douglas County, said his government may not have applied for RTA funding for a youth sports complex/archaeological park had the rules in HB 1056 been in place.

No date has been set yet for the bill’s next hearing.

Read more

Bolstering Tourism - Pieblo Chieftain

Bolstering tourism

Pueblo Chieftain

PUEBLO’S PLAN to create a new tourism zone designed to bring new visitors to the state is the strongest of the proposals that have been proffered.

   That’s not just our opinion. State Rep. Andy Kerr, a Denver Democrat, agrees. He is sponsoring House Bill 1056, which would give preference to applications that focus on luring out-of-state tourists.

   Under the Regional Tourism Act, special districts would retain excess sales tax revenues to spend on tourism projects. That act was supposed to be an incentive to draw people to Colorado from other states — thus bringing in new money to the benefit of the entire state — but some of the competing proposals don’t seem to focus on that.

   Thus, Rep. Kerr is trying to bolster the original concept with HB1056.

   Pueblo’s proposal is built around bringing people to the Historic Arkansas Riverwalk of Pueblo from other states who otherwise wouldn’t be coming to Colorado. Among its features are a training facility for the Professional Bull Riders, which has its world headquarters on HARP. The arena also could host any variety of amateur sports from the Southwest.

   Likewise, an aquatic center with a 50-meter pool would be available for athletes to compete at the high school and collegiate levels.

   A Walk of Valor would run from the Medal of Honor Memorial to the nearby Center for American Values. This feature is envisioned to draw military reunions — particularly national ones — to Pueblo.

   An exhibition hall as an extension of the Pueblo Convention Center is envisioned as a magnet for multistate trade and consumer shows.

   Rep. Kerr says the governor’s office brought the concept of HB1056 to him. A spokesman for Gov. John Hickenlooper confirmed that the governor supports the bill.

   We were surprised to hear that some Republicans are opposing this measure. But just because the prime sponsor is a Democrat is no reason to oppose sensible legislation meant to keep the original Regional Tourism Act on its intended track — again, enticing new money into the state.

   The bill is scheduled for a hearing Wednesday by the House Local Affairs Committee, which includes two Pueblo-area lawmakers, Reps. Keith Swerdfeger and Sal Pace. We encourage them to persuade their fellow committee members to support this bill in bipartisan fashion.

Read more

Bill would boost HARP expansion

Patrick Malone
DENVER — A bill being considered in the General Assembly would strengthen Pueblo’s bid to land up to $20 million for a wide-ranging expansion of the Historic Arkansas Riverwalk of Pueblo, say its sponsor and local business leaders.
  Pueblo submitted an application under the Regional Tourism Act last year. It proposes a multisport arena for international bull-riding training and amateur sporting events, an exhibition hall for large consumer and trade shows, an aquatic center with a 50-meter pool and a “Walk of Valor” tied in with the Home of Heroes memorial. A private developer also is eyeing construction of a hotel associated with the exhibition hall if it is built.
  Under HB1056, preference would be given to applications that focus on luring out-of-state tourists to Colorado. Pueblo’s application is particularly strong in that area, said Rep. Andy Kerr, D-Denver, who sponsored the bill.
  “My reading of the feedback that all of the proposed projects have gotten suggests that the Pueblo proposal is one of the strongest for bringing in out-of-state tourists,” Kerr said. “I think that this bill will only help strengthen Pueblo’s standing.”
  “Pueblo all along, from when we started our application, we were clearly informed that the objective was to bring out-of-state visitors for tourism, and we built our application on that,” said Rod Slyhoff, president and CEO of the Greater Pueblo Chamber of Commerce, which supports HB1056.
  Pueblo’s application is one of six competing for money. Two are expected to be chosen this year, and could be announced as soon as April.
Legislation carried last year by Kerr and Rep. Keith Swerdfeger, R-Pueblo West, expanded the number of projects the state can authorize to six over a three-year span from two in a single year.
  The tourism act allows local governments to apply to the Colorado Economic Development Commission to create special districts. Within those zones, excess sales tax revenue can be retained and spent on tourism projects.
  “The intent of the original Regional Tourism Act wasn’t for Colorado communities to cannibalize each other for tourism dollars,” Kerr said. “If we’re just stealing tourists from one zone of the state and drawing them to another, why give a sales-tax break?”
   Kerr said the governor’s office brought the concept of HB1056 to him. Gov. John Hickenlooper’s spokesman, Eric Brown, confirmed the governor supports the bill.
  However, others do not. Kerr, a candidate for a state Senate seat, said some Republicans have expressed opposition to it.
  “Part of it is a political worry that a Democrat who is running for a Senate seat might actually pass a bill that helps create jobs and increase tourism in Colorado,” he said.   Representatives of districts in the running for regional tourism funds whose communities’ applications are less focused on drawing out-of-state tourists also have had objections.
  “They think it weakens their proposals,” Kerr said. “My thought there is, put forward a proposal that increases out-of-state tourism, and then you won’t have to worry. It’s meant to be a competitive process.”
  The bill is set for a hearing Wednesday in the House Local Affairs Committee, which includes two lawmakers from the Pueblo area: Swerdfeger and Rep. Sal Pace, D-Pueblo. Kerr was puzzled that the committee postponed hearing the bill last week when it was scheduled, and frustrated by what he heard from witnesses who were prepared to testify in support of it.
  “The witnesses who are testifying in favor of this bill have been pressured not to” by Republicans and representatives of areas concerned that their tourism applications will be hurt by the bill.
  “We were made aware of that,” Slyhoff acknowledged. “That’s unfortunate. It’s a shame that sometimes the party caucuses get in the way of good legislation. The ones that really don’t benefit from that type of behavior are the citizens of Colorado who would benefit from more tourists coming here from out of state and spending money.”
 Slyhoff said applicants will be afforded 30 minutes each on March 8 for presentations about their projects to the Colorado Economic Development Commission, which is expected to authorize two applicants’ projects this spring.
  Slyhoff said he is confident in Pueblo’s application and believes it stands a good chance of being selected regardless of the success of HB1056. Kerr is less assured that the right projects will be chosen if the bill fails.
  “If this bill doesn’t pass, it puts into jeopardy the appropriate projects actually being approved and would give weight to projects that don’t actually bring in out-of-state tourists,” he said. “I think Pueblo has an excellent application. My guess would be that they’re pretty highly ranked right now, but if we don’t pass this bill, I think that puts all of the projects in jeopardy, especially the best ones.”

Read more

The Durango Herald: Youth Council Calls for Suicide Prevention

The Durango Herald

Joe Hanel

DENVER – Dressed in a sharp blue suit and neat tie, University of Denver freshman Thomas Tarler looked like he fit right in at the Capitol when he testified Monday at the House Education Committee.

No one would have guessed what he did for his birthday last Friday.

“I spent it in a psychiatric ward. I had to turn myself in Wednesday night because I just couldn’t handle it, and I didn’t trust myself to keep myself safe,” he said.

Tarler, an alumnus of the Colorado Youth Advisory Council, urged legislators to pass House Joint Resolution 1004, which calls for suicide-prevention training for teachers and a youth-led working group to reduce Colorado’s sky-high suicide rate.

Durango High School junior Brenna Christensen, a current COYAC member, also testified for the resolution.

“Kids like to wear black and be upset and talk about how terrible the world is. So sometimes the kids who actually are experiencing depression and suicidal thoughts get glossed over, because they’re not the ones wearing black or they’re not the ones making the biggest fuss,” Christensen said.

Christensen and her youth council colleagues researched and drafted the resolution after identifying suicide – not pregnancy, drugs or crumbling schools – as the No. 1 issue among Colorado teenagers.

The youth council conducted a survey of 712 young people and found that 70 percent were “very concerned” about suicide.

Comments from the 13 House Education Committee members backed up the survey. Four legislators spoke out about their personal experience with suicide, among friends, family members or in the schools where they teach for their day jobs.

The resolution zeroes in on teachers because they have frequent contact with students.

Christensen’s teacher had to cope with the suicide of one of his brightest students several years ago, but the experience helped him to help Christensen when she went through a rough time last year.

“That one mistake of not noticing that kid and thinking, upon reflection, that you should have known, can haunt a teacher. We want to give them the tools that allow them to save lives,” said Christensen, daughter of Katherine and Steve Christensen.

HJR 1004 passed 13-0 and now faces a vote of the full House.

Sen. Ellen Roberts, R-Durango, created the Youth Advisory Council through a bill in 2008, in order to inform legislators about topics important to young people.

The youth council has taken positions on bills, but the suicide-prevention resolution is its first piece of original legislation.

“It’s doing exactly what I had hoped,” Roberts said.

Animas High School student Daniel Fallon-Cyr also serves on the 40-person council and attended the meeting Monday.

Read more

Colorado News Agency: Representative Kerr Helps Step up the Fight Against Teen Suicide

Colorado News Agency

Debi Brazzale

Lawmakers voted Monday at the Capitol to delve deeper into teen suicide, with the House Education Committee unanimously passing a resolution calling for a study of the issue.

The bipartisan House Joint Resolution 1004, sponsored by Reps. Tom Massey, R-Poncha Springs, and Andy Kerr, D-Lakewood, in the House and Sens. Ellen Roberts, R-Durango, and Michael Johnston, D-Denver, in the Senate, directs the Colorado Youth Advisory Council to study preventative measures regarding teen suicide and to report its findings to the legislature.

Citing statistics indicating that one out of every five teenagers in Colorado has considered suicide, Massey said nothing else could be more important than tackling the issue.

“If there’s anything we can do to stem this tide, it’s of paramount importance that we do whatever we can,” said Massey.

Kerr, a teacher, said he has seen the devastation teen suicide has bestowed on his school district in Jefferson County.

“I know personally that my community has been heavily impacted by teen suicide,” said Kerr. “Whatever we can do to prevent it from happening and raise awareness in our communities is critical.”

Driving the issue home, University of Denver student Thomas Tarler, who has struggled with depression throughout high school and his young adult life, said current approaches need to be augmented with a more direct approach.

“To say that there is a hotline to call, that does nothing,” said Tarler. “We need a more proactive approach. This should be the highest priority in Colorado. Suicide affects every teenager.”

The resolution is now headed for consideration by the full House before it heads to the Senate.

Read more

Associated Press: Businesses could weigh in on Colorado legislation

The House sponsor, Democratic Rep. Andy Kerr, is a middle-school teacher who said that no one gets more frustrated than educators when lawmakers pass well-intentioned regulations that don't work.

"Every time the Legislature got into session it seemed they passed legislation about education. I would look at those and think, 'Have any of these people talked to someone in education?'" Kerr said.

Read more

Bill would keep status quo at Colorado's bars, restaurants

KUSA - 9News

written by: Jeffrey Wolf

DENVER - Colorado's bars and restaurants could
continue to serve low-alcohol beer under a plan
being debated at the State Capitol.

Right now, only convenience stores and grocery
stores are allowed to sell 3.2 percent beer, but state
regulators have never cracked down on restaurants
and bars for serving it.

A measure passed last year requires them to do so.

The restaurants and bars said the increased
regulation would anger customers and cost jobs, so
they asked a bipartisan group of legislators to
change the law.

"When you're busy serving people and there's a line
out the door and work is going so fast, the last
thing you need is for the bartender to sit there and
double check the alcohol content of every beer
they're trying to serve," Rep. Andy Kerr (D-
Lakewood) said.

The increased enforcement was pushed by the
grocery stores, who want the opportunity to sell
beer, wine and spirits in Colorado. Efforts to allow
that to happen have failed at the Capitol each of the
last few years.

(KUSA-TV © 2011 Multimedia Holdings Corporation)

Read more

Small Business is the Key to Economic Recovery in Colorado

Just this past month CNBC ranked Colorado number 3 on its annual list of "Top States for Business". Forbes Magazine ranked Colorado the fourth best state for business last year. And ITIF New Economy Index ranked Colorado 2nd in the country in Entrepreneurial Activity. Clearly, our state has much to boast about when it comes to being business-friendly.


Though still high, our unemployment rate is well below the national average.And experts predict that we'll be among the first states to recover from the recession. We've been committed to legislation that supports job growth and business development, and our seeds are beginning to sprout.


The Democratic majority at the statehouse has led the way in advancing economic development strategies. Currently, nothing is doing more to drive the creation of small business than the New Energy Economy. Nearly 20,000 new green-collar jobs and 1,800 new companies - almost all small businesses - are attributable to the innovation our leadership is providing. Tens of thousands of jobs will be created here in Colorado in industries like solar and wind energy through a new law that requires investor-owned utility companies to get 30 percent of their energy from renewable sources by the year 2020.


Small businesses need to be able to access capital to survive and thrive.That's why I helped implement the Colorado Credit Reserve Program, which leverages as much as $50 million to provide loans for small businesses so they can access credit to sustain themselves and grow. We helped cut small business taxes and expenses, too, by slashing the Business Personal Property Tax - and the accompanying paperwork -- for more than 30,000 local companies. And we provided a new credit to businesses that bring new jobs to the state.


Lakewood businesses that I visit tell me that the number one thing they need to help them grow is a trained work force. That's why we have focused on expanding training and re-training programs. Democrats support economic development and are getting people the skills they need to re-enter or advance in the workplace through the Green Jobs Training Workforce and other similar programs. And we also made it easier to transfer credits from two- to four-year colleges and universities.


Democrats are encouraging research and development in clean-technology and the biosciences with a sales tax exemption on related equipment; competitive grants for universities and promising businesses, so they can commercialize their clean-energy technologies; and we created an income tax credit for investments made in development and manufacturing to help small businesses obtain necessary "angel" funding.


We developed bold new ideas like "Work Share Program," which helps struggling businesses save money. By reducing the number of hours a group of employees work instead of having to lay them off and allowing workers with reduced hours to apply for some unemployment compensation. It's a win-win for employers and employees.


Though we were able to advance numerous pro-business bills, tough choices still had to be made to balance the budget this year. In the end, we took a balanced approach and eliminated $3.5 billion from the state budget, passed measures to eliminate waste and fraud, cut government programs and tightened corporate tax loopholes.


Our goal is to create more job opportunities so that our neighbors and family members can get back to work immediately and to foster a sustainable state and local economy we can all participate in. By focusing on creating jobs and opportunities for business to survive and thrive, we are ensuring that Colorado will recover from the recession quicker and smarter.

Read more


Connect Online